Ana Bolena perdió su cabeza. - MxMo: Limit One -- Mahjongg Cocktail
there is a method to my madness. if you figure it out, please let me know.

rivet steed
Date: 2008-03-16 23:18
Subject: MxMo: Limit One -- Mahjongg Cocktail
Security: Public
Tags:cocktails, cointreau, gin, harlequin, mixology monday, rum
Mixology Monday: Limit One Upon reading the theme for this Mixology Monday, I drew a blank. The only recipe I know well that fit the bill was the Mai Tai, which I really love to make. But it seems like MxMo should be an encouragement to try something new, and I certainly didn't want to fall into the newbie trap of sticking with the tried and true. Thinking this might be a good time to try a new tiki drink, I searched around a bit, but most that initially appealed required drams and juices I didn't have close at hand.

Mahjongg Cocktail with ingredients
In the meantime, I've continued working through Good Spirits by A. J. Rathbun. On Friday, I stumbled upon the Mahjongg cocktail. At 4 parts gin to 1 part rum and 1 part Cointreau, it seemed a little gin heavy, even to me, so I checked the CocktailDB1, which suggested a milder 3:1:1, which I tried. I left out the optional lemon twist, as well. The resulting drink was nice, but not much more.

Tonight I did some additional searching for drinks that might fit the bill, when I decided to revisit the Mahjongg. I checked a few more sites, all of which seemed to agree with Rathbun's 4:1:1. Even with the CocktailDB's recipe, it met the requirement (nothin' but 80 proof plus spirits, after all!). But if I upped to Rathbun's recipe, I hit the 3 ounces, to boot. So I mixed the drink up again. This time, I included the lemon twist, as well. I ignored Rathbun's recommendation to shake instead of stir (he has you shake your martini and manhattan, fer cryin' out loud!).

Much to my surprise, this was a much more balanced drink. I know the lemon twist added that extra special something, but contrary to my fears, the higher ratio of gin make the drink smoother. Not sure if that's because of the Aviation in particular, but I'll definitely look to making the Mahjongg with this recipe in the future. Just not tonight. Already had my limit of one.

Mahjongg Cocktail
2 oz gin (Aviation, 84 proof)
1/2 oz white rum (Appleton White, 80 proof)
1/2 oz Cointreau (Harlequin Orange Liqueur, 80 proof)

Stir in mixing glass with ice and strain into cocktail glass. Garnish with lemon twist

--
[1] let me take this chance to promote my firefox search plugins: go to http://www.stevideter.com/cocktaildb.html to learn more.
Post A Comment | 15 Comments | Add to Memories | Share | Link



rone: sherman
User: ronebofh
Date: 2008-03-17 06:34 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
Keyword:sherman
So what exactly is the problem with shaking?
Reply | Thread | Link



rivet steed
User: anavolena
Date: 2008-03-17 06:44 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
The general rule is to stir when you have all liquor, and shake when you have juice (or egg whites) to integrate.

I have a strong preference for stirring a Manhattan, and find that shaking adds undesirable aeration. Stirring it leads to a smoother, more velvety cocktail.

But as with all religious wars, the answer is what you prefer. I know people who find shaking emulsifies the vermouth in a martini in a way they really enjoy.

I haven't really gotten into martinis yet, The Bourbon Manhattan is my current vermouth-based goto drink, and I shudder when I get one that's been shaken (and don't start me on forgetting there should be bitters in there, dammit). Although the Martinez may be replacing it in my heart.
Reply | Parent | Thread | Link



Glinting Q. Formalize: snorkeling
User: ilanarama
Date: 2008-03-17 15:12 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
Keyword:snorkeling
Ooh, very cool. I haven't heard of Harlequin (I doubt it's available here) - how does it compare to Cointreau?
Reply | Thread | Link



rivet steed
User: anavolena
Date: 2008-03-17 22:25 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
The Harlequin is quite nice, and is on par with Cointreau, although technically a little closer to Grand Marnier, I think. (I still get confused about how to properly categorize orange brandy-based liqueurs).

They've recently started selling it here in the Washington State liquor stores. I picked up a bottle because at $19.25, it's nearly half the price of Grand Marnier ($39.95) or Cointreau ($35.95). I'll probably stick with it for the time being, at least until the results of the great orange liqueur comparison come in.
Reply | Parent | Thread | Link



Glinting Q. Formalize
User: ilanarama
Date: 2008-03-20 15:41 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
Woo, looking forward to that. I prefer Grand Marnier to Cointreau neat, but Cointreau is nicer in cocktails because of that slight oily mouthfeel. I have been using Patron's Citronge which again, much less expensive than the big boys. (Although your prices are another $4 or so higher than they are here!)
Reply | Parent | Thread | Link



rivet steed
User: anavolena
Date: 2008-03-20 19:41 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
the state liquor board system here sucks. prices are high, and selection is very limited.
Reply | Parent | Thread | Link



runoknows
User: runoknows
Date: 2008-03-18 02:44 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
Good to see another LJ-er on here!

I'm going to have to give the Harlequin a chance; Mr. tmfiii and I did a Cointreau, Grand Marnier, and Creole Shrubb tasting earlier today.

Reply | Thread | Link



rivet steed: whisky
User: anavolena
Date: 2008-03-18 02:59 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
Keyword:whisky
Hopefully you'll post about the results of your tasting!

Thanks for stopping by. I've been wondering if ye old LJ is the right place for the cocktail stuff. At the very least, it lets me get a feel for it and decide if I want to set up Yet Another Blog.
Reply | Parent | Thread | Link



runoknows
User: runoknows
Date: 2008-03-18 03:02 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
We have the same debate about LJ. I like being here, if only to help other LJ-ers congregate; on the other hand, a full "other" blog would have its own benefits.

I'm just always happy to see more people on LJ, however, talking about cocktails. It's the critical mass philosophy; the more who do, the more who will, that kind of thing. :-)
Reply | Parent | Thread | Link



User: (Anonymous)
Date: 2008-03-19 16:27 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
One thing LiveJournal doesn't have is an RSS Feed! (Or does it? I don't know.)
I was adding you to my blogroll at The Pegu Blog (http://www.killingtime.com/Pegu/), and can't find a feed. I have a neat little widget that lists the latest ramblings of a sample from my blogroll. Is there a feed option that I'm missing?
Reply | Parent | Thread | Link



rivet steed
User: anavolena
Date: 2008-03-19 16:30 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
LJ does, in fact, have rss feeds; I should add a direct link to it.

Atom: http://anavolena.livejournal.com/data/atom
RSS: http://anavolena.livejournal.com/data/rss

Reply | Parent | Thread | Link



runoknows
User: runoknows
Date: 2008-03-19 16:35 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
Here's how to do it:

http://www.livejournal.com/support/faqbrowse.bml?faqid=149&q=RSS+feeds&lang=

Reply | Parent | Thread | Link



atomic_pencil
User: atomic_pencil
Date: 2008-03-19 17:50 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
Great-looking drink! I'm a gin freak, so this one looks right up my alley.

-Dr. Bamboo (Atomic Pencil on LJ)
Reply | Thread | Link



rivet steed
User: anavolena
Date: 2008-03-20 02:43 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
Thankee much. I enjoyed your entry for this MxMo (and your blog in general) - I'm only just darning to start playing with recipes, so it's really helpful to see the processes other folk use to tinker.

Since Runoknows and I already started the topic - is there a specific reason you went with a separate blog for your cocktails and didn't use LJ?

There's a more general discussion on my friendslist of whether LJ constitutes a "real" blog provider in the eyes of the wider world.
Reply | Parent | Thread | Link



atomic_pencil
User: atomic_pencil
Date: 2008-03-20 18:59 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
I think the reason I wanted to use Blogger was that at the time (a little over a year ago), there was something about the way that they allowed you to upload pictures into your posts that I liked better than the way LJ handled it. I also found Blogger's format a little more appealing than the whole "friends list" system.

Also, Blogger just seemed a tad easier to use for a low-tech guy like me- I liked their user interface and navigation better than LJ.

But honestly, I really have no gripes with either one. I think they're both pretty easy to use (and free!).
Reply | Thread | Link



browse
my journal
links
November 2008